PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING REFLECTION PAPER
The purpose of this paper is to define, describe and explain your personal beliefs about the four concepts of the nursing metaparadigm and their inter-relationship to one another as they guide your current nursing practice. There are no right or wrong thoughts, feelings or beliefs; these represent your own philosophical beliefs. Then you must correlate or link your current philosophy to one particular nursing theory, identify these. The reflection paper is to written in MS Word, be typed according to APA format, and must be 3 pages in length. The paper should include a title page and reference page, however, these pages are not to be included in the final count. Evaluation criteria are as follows:
Criteria for Personal Philosophy of Nursing Reflection Paper:
- Introduction & brief description identifies purpose of the paper and the factors influencing the development of the personal nursing philosophy. 4%
- Define, describe and explain your personal thoughts, feelings and beliefs about the concepts of the 4 nursing metaparadigms: 5%
- Person/client
- Environment
- Health
- Nursing
- Identification and brief description of the nursing theory found to be the most compatible with the student’s personal nursing philosophy. Discuss the core components of the theory and how it reflects the student’s personal philosophies. 4%
- Organization, documentation, references followed APA format. 2%
Writing Assignment Rubric
A (15) | B (13) | C (11) | D/F (8) | Score | |
Focus: Purpose | Purpose is clear | Shows awareness of purpose | Shows limited awareness of purpose | No awareness | |
Main idea | Clearly presents a main idea and supports it throughout the paper. | There is a main idea supported throughout most of the paper. | Vague sense of a main idea, weakly supported throughout the paper. | No main idea | |
Organization: Overall | Well-planned and well- thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions and conclusion. | Good overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. | There is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools are used weakly or missing | No sense of organization | |
Content | Exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence & facts, as well as examples and specific details. | Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific. | Content is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature. | Content is not sound |
Research (if | Sources are | Sources are | Sources support | The paper | |
assignment | exceptionally | well integrated | some claims | does not use | |
includes a | well- | and support the | made in the | adequate | |
research | integrated and | paper’s claims. | paper, but | research or | |
component) | they support | There may be | might not be | if it does, | |
claims argued | occasional | integrated well | the sources | ||
in the paper | errors, but the | within the | are not | ||
very | sources and | paper’s | integrated | ||
effectively. | Works Cited | argument. | well. They | ||
Quotations | conform to | There may be a | are not cited | ||
and Works | MLA style | few errors in | correctly | ||
Cited conform | sheet. | MLA style.. | according to | ||
to MLA style | MLA style, | ||||
sheet. | nor listed | ||||
correctly on | |||||
the Works | |||||
Cited page. | |||||
Grammar & | Excellent | A few errors in | Shows a pattern | Continuous | |
Mechanics | grammar, | grammar, | of errors in | errors | |
spelling, | spelling, | spelling, | |||
syntax and | syntax and | grammar, | |||
punctuation. | punctuation, | syntax and/or | |||
but not many. | punctuation. | ||||
Could also be a | |||||
sign of lack of | |||||
proof-reading. | |||||
APA | Uses APA | Uses APA | Reflects | Does not | |
Guidelines | guidelines | guidelines with | incomplete | use APA | |
accurately and | minor | knowledge of | guidelines. | ||
consistently to | violations to | APA guidelines | |||
cite sources | cite sources | ||||
and | and formatting | ||||
formatting | |||||
Total |
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.