A​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​dditional Resource: https://www.aanp.org/legislation-regulation/state-legislation/state-practice-environment (Links to an external site.) Complete a 3-5-page paper (not including cover sheet and reference page) Compare the state of Texas to another state of your choice in the terms of ANP regulation in ONE of the following issues. Delegated Authority Practice Location APN owned practice Prescriptive authority Student expectations: Professional/graduate level paper Use of a cover sheet APA format 3-5 scholarly references (see left-hand navigator: resources) Organization/Format: Narrative Paper Specifics: Provide a Definition statement regarding the issue that you are discussing Review the state to state comparison: narrative Provide pros/cons of each state, from your interpretation of the regulation influence on the APN practice Could you find any discussion on a plan to change the regulatory status/pending bills that might influence the state, if no information was available the provide a brief discussion how/where you searched? Discuss one key point that may be applicable to your future practice. Provide your opinion on which state might offer more opportunity for your future practice and WHY. NP ISSUE RubricActions Attached Files: Module 3 Assignment specifics.docxActions Rubric Module 3 Assignment Rubric; NP Issue Module 3 Assignment Rubric; NP Issue Criteria Ratings Pts This cri​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​terion is linked to a Learning Outcome Definition statement regarding the issue presented Weight 10.00% 10 pts excellent 7.5 pts Needs Improvement 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Review of State by State comparison Weight 15.00% 15 pts excellent 11.25 pts Needs Improvement 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Pro’s/Cons of each State, student interpretation of how this would influence their APN practice Weight 15.00% 15 pts excellent 11.25 pts Needs Improvement 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Verbalized if any pending legislature that may change those states regulatory status Weight 20.00% 20 pts excellent 15 pts Needs Improvement 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Provided an opinion on which state may offer more opportunity to their future ANP practice Weight 10.00% 10 pts excellent 7.5 pts Needs Improvement 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussed one key point that may be applicable to their future practice Weight 15.00% 15 pts excellent 11.25 pts Needs Improvement 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3-5 Scholarly articles Weight 5.00% 5 pts excellent 3.25 pts Needs Improvement 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar/APA/Reference page Weight 10.00% 10 pts excellent 7.5 pts Needs Improvement 10 pts Total Points: 100 Previous Nex​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​t