Call/WhatsApp: +1 332 209 4094

Control Function Analysis: How change management can help retain or promote employee loyalty.

Control Function Analysis: How change management can help retain or promote employee loyalty.

Today’s workforce is diverse in terms of age and other aspects that influence performance and success. Leaders must both motivate and support employees so that they can continuously adapt to change while creating opportunity in their careers.

Develop a 2,100-word analysis of how change management can help retain or promote employee loyalty by taking into account:

Motivating individuals to stay engaged
Monitoring employee performance through the control function of management
Communicating the change process at both a strategic and tactical level
Include at least three peer-reviewed references

After techniques are positioned and plans are created, management’s primary process is always to take steps to make certain that these ideas are carried out, or, if circumstances justify, that the ideas are modified. This is the critical control function of management. And since management involves directing the activities of others, a major part of the control function is making sure other people do what should be done.

The managing literature is loaded with guidance on the way to attain greater control. These tips usually incorporates a description of some type of dimension and comments process:

The essential manage method, anywhere it really is discovered and anything located and whatever it regulates, involves three steps: (1) creating criteria. (2) measuring performance against these standards. and (3) correcting deviations from standards and plans.1 A good management control system stimulates action by spotting the significant variations from the original plan and highlighting them for the people who can set things right.2 Controls need to focus on results.3 This focus on measurement and feedback, however, can be seriously misleading. In many circumstances, a control system built around measurement and feedback is not feasible. And even when feasibility is not a limitation, use of a feedback-oriented control system is often an inferior solution. Yet, good controls can be established and maintained using other techniques.

Exactly what is needed can be a wider viewpoint on manage as a administration work: this informative article deals with this type of perspective. The first part summarizes the general control problem by discussing the underlying reasons for implementing controls and by describing what can realistically be achieved. In the second part, the various types of controls available are identified. The last part discusses why the appropriate choice of controls is and should be different in different settings.

If all workers always performed what was perfect for the corporation, handle — and even management — would not necessary. But, obviously individuals are sometimes unable or unwilling to act in the organization’s best interest, and a set of controls must be implemented to guard against undesirable behavior and to encourage desirable actions.

One significant school of problems against which handle systems safeguard may be called individual constraints. People do not always understand what is expected of them nor how they can best perform their jobs, as they may lack some requisite ability, training, or information. In addition, human beings have a number of innate perceptual and cognitive biases, such as an inability to process new information optimally or to make consistent decisions, and these biases can reduce organizational effectiveness.4 Some of these personal limitations are correctable or avoidable, but for others, controls are required to guard against their deleterious effects.

Regardless of whether personnel are properly loaded to perform a job effectively, some pick not to do so, since individual objectives and business objectives might not coincide completely. In other words, there is a lack of goal congruence. Steps must often be taken either to increase goal congruence or to prevent employees from acting in their own interest where goal incongruence exists.

If nothing is done to safeguard the organization versus the achievable event of unwelcome habits or perhaps the omission of appealing conduct a result of these private limits and motivational difficulties, extreme repercussions may final result. At a minimum, inadequate control can result in lower performance or higher risk of poor performance. At the extreme, if performance is not controlled on one or more critical performance dimensions, the outcome could be organizational failure.

Excellent management, meaning complete certainty that real accomplishment will carry on according to program, is never feasible due to most likely occurrence of unpredicted situations. However, good control should mean that an informed person could be reasonably confident that no major unpleasant surprises will occur. A high probability of forthcoming poor performance, despite a reasonable operating plan, sometimes is given the label “out of control.”

Some crucial attributes with this desirable state of excellent control must be showcased. First, control is future-oriented: the goal is to have no unpleasant surprises in the future. The past is not relevant except as a guide to the future, Second, control is multidimensional, and good control cannot be established over an activity with multiple objectives unless performance on all significant dimensions has been considered. Thus, for example, control of a production department cannot be considered good unless all the major performance dimensions, including quality, efficiency, and asset management, are well controlled. Third, the assessment of whether good performance assurance has been achieved is difficult and subjective. An informed expert might judge that the control system in place is adequate because no major bad surprises are likely, but this judgment is subject to error because adequacy must be measured against a future that can be very difficult to assess. Fourth, better control is not always economically desirable. Like any other economic good, the control tools are costly and should be implemented only if the expected benefits exceed the costs.

In most scenarios, supervisors can prevent some management problems by letting no possibilities for incorrect habits. One possibility is automation. Computers and other means of automation reduce the organization’s exposure to control problems because they can be set to perform appropriately (that is, as the organization desires), and they will perform more consistently than do human beings. Consequently, control is improved.

Another avoidance probability is centralization, for example what transpires with very vital selections at many company levels. If a manager makes all the decisions in certain areas, those areas cease to be control problems in a managerial sense because no other persons are involved.

Still another avoidance probability is chance-expressing by having an outside system, for example an insurance provider. Many companies bond employees in sensitive positions, and in so doing, they reduce the probability that the employees’ behavior will cause significant harm to the firm.

Lastly, some handle difficulties can and should be prevented by reduction of an enterprise or an functioning entirely. Managers without the means to control certain activities, perhaps because they do not understand the processes well, can eliminate the associated control problems by turning over their potential profits and the associated risk to a third party, for example, by subcontracting or divesting.

If control are not able to, or decides to never avoid the control issues due to relying on other individuals, they have to deal with the difficulties by applying a number of handle tactics. The large number of tactics that are available to help achieve good control can be classified usefully into three main categories, according to the object of control; that is, whether control is exercised over specific actions, results, or personnel. Table 1 shows many common controls classified according to their control object; these controls are described in the following sections.